Panipat Immigration Fraud: ₹40 Lakh Allegedly Taken in Overseas Job Promise, Four Booked After SC Commission Intervention

Spread the love
panipat-immigration-fraud-40-lakh-siwan-case

A fresh Panipat immigration fraud case has come to light in Siwah village, where a man has alleged that around ₹40 lakh was taken from his family on the promise of sending his son abroad. The complaint also alleges threats, assault and caste-based abuse when the family sought the return of the money.

The case came to the attention of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC), Delhi, after the complainant said he did not receive relief despite approaching local authorities. Following the Commission’s intervention and recommendation for an impartial investigation, Sector 29 Police Station in Panipat registered a case against four people.

The accused named in the case are Gurdev, his son Sumit, Sumit’s wife Jyoti and Gurdev’s wife, all residents of Siwah village.

The allegations have not been established in court. Gurdev has denied the allegations and said the dispute was related to mutual financial transactions rather than fraud involving overseas employment.


₹40 Lakh Allegedly Taken on Promise of Sending Son Abroad

According to the complaint filed at Sector 29 Police Station, Siwah resident Ramphal Singh alleged that Sumit, Jyoti, Gurdev and Gurdev’s wife persuaded his son that they could help him travel abroad.

The complainant alleged that, relying on these assurances, his family paid approximately ₹40 lakh by March 2024.

According to Ramphal, the accused allegedly promised that his son would be sent abroad after the required arrangements were completed.

However, the complainant alleged that the promised overseas opportunity did not materialise and that the money was not returned.

This forms the central allegation in the latest Panipat immigration fraud case.


Money Dispute Allegedly Escalated Into Threats

Ramphal alleged that when he began asking the accused to return the money, the situation became confrontational.

According to his complaint, the accused allegedly abused him, used caste-based slurs and threatened to kill him in an accident.

The complainant further alleged that the repeated threats and harassment caused him significant mental distress and affected his health for a prolonged period.

Police are now examining these allegations as part of the investigation.


Phone Recording Allegedly Captured Caste-Based Remarks

The complaint also refers to an alleged telephone conversation involving Subhash, another resident of the village.

According to Ramphal, Gurdev had contacted Subhash regarding the money dispute. During the conversation, Gurdev allegedly made derogatory remarks about Ramphal and his caste.

The conversation was reportedly recorded on Subhash’s mobile phone.

The alleged recording may form part of the evidence being examined by investigators, subject to verification and forensic assessment.


Assault Allegedly Took Place After Victim Objected

Ramphal further alleged that he later went to Gurdev to object to the alleged remarks and demand resolution of the financial dispute.

According to the complaint, all four accused allegedly slapped him, used caste-based abusive language and threatened him with serious consequences.

The complainant said the incident and subsequent threats caused considerable mental suffering.

Police will determine the circumstances of the alleged confrontation and the roles, if any, of each of the named accused during the investigation.


National Commission for Scheduled Castes Intervenes

The matter reportedly reached the National Commission for Scheduled Castes in Delhi after Ramphal claimed that his earlier complaints had not resulted in the desired action at the local level.

According to the supplied report, the Commission heard both sides and recommended an impartial investigation, registration of an FIR and submission of a report within 15 days.

Following the Commission’s intervention and directions from senior police officials, Sector 29 Police Station registered the case against the four accused.

The development adds a significant institutional dimension to the Panipat immigration fraud investigation.


Accused Denies Fraud Allegations

Gurdev has reportedly denied the allegations.

According to his version, the dispute is related to mutual financial transactions and was not connected to cheating anyone under the pretext of sending a person abroad.

He also reportedly said that a village panchayat had already considered the dispute on three occasions and that Ramphal had signed the panchayat’s decision.

Gurdev further claimed that he had separated from his son in 2018.

These claims will have to be examined alongside the complainant’s allegations and the evidence collected during the police investigation.


Police to Examine Financial and Other Evidence

The investigation will be important in establishing whether the alleged ₹40 lakh payment was actually connected to an overseas employment or immigration arrangement and what happened to the money thereafter.

Investigators are expected to examine relevant financial records, communications, statements of the parties and witnesses, and any other available evidence.

The alleged phone recording referred to in the complaint may also be examined to establish its authenticity and context.

The police investigation will determine whether the allegations made by the complainant are supported by evidence.


Panipat Has Seen Repeated Immigration Fraud Cases

The latest Panipat immigration fraud case comes against a wider backdrop of immigration-related complaints in Haryana.

According to data reported by The Indian Express, Panipat recorded 106 immigration fraud cases between 2019 and October 2024, as part of a wider rise in such cases across Haryana. The report said Haryana recorded hundreds of cases involving immigration fraud during the period.

Earlier, Haryana authorities had also formed a special investigation team to examine immigration fraud cases. In 2023, officials reported that 501 immigration fraud cases had been registered across Haryana by August 27, including 24 cases in Panipat at that point.

More recently, a Punjab and Haryana High Court order in an unrelated Panipat case also dealt with allegations that ₹40 lakh had been taken on the promise of sending a complainant’s son to America. The court described the allegations as serious and referred to the broader concerns surrounding organised immigration fraud and illegal migration.

These developments show why people seeking overseas employment should verify immigration and recruitment arrangements before making substantial payments.


What People Should Check Before Paying an Overseas Agent

The latest Panipat immigration fraud allegations highlight several precautions that prospective migrants should take.

Before handing over money to an agent, applicants should:

  • Verify the agent’s registration and credentials.
  • Obtain a written agreement describing the services being provided.
  • Ask for receipts for every payment.
  • Verify the overseas employer independently.
  • Confirm the exact visa category being offered.
  • Never rely solely on WhatsApp messages or verbal promises.
  • Keep copies of passports and all submitted documents.
  • Avoid large cash payments wherever possible.
  • Independently verify visa and employment documents.
  • Report suspicious demands, threats or fraudulent documents to the authorities.

A promise of a high-paying overseas job should never be treated as genuine merely because an agent is personally known or recommended by someone.


What Happens Next?

The Panipat immigration fraud case is now under police investigation following the registration of the FIR.

Investigators will need to establish the financial trail, examine the allegations of threats and assault, verify the alleged phone recording and determine the individual role of each of the four accused.

The intervention of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes has also placed additional focus on the investigation and the requirement to report developments within the stipulated period.

The accused have denied the allegations, and the case remains at the investigation stage. Any criminal liability will ultimately depend on the evidence and judicial proceedings.


Panipat Immigration Fraud Case: Key Details

ParticularDetails
LocationSiwah village, Panipat
Police StationSector 29, Panipat
ComplainantRamphal Singh
Alleged AmountAround ₹40 lakh
Purpose AllegedSending complainant’s son abroad
AccusedGurdev, Sumit, Jyoti and Gurdev’s wife
AllegationsFraud, threats, assault and caste-based abuse
Commission InvolvedNational Commission for Scheduled Castes
Commission’s RecommendationImpartial investigation and FIR
Current StatusInvestigation underway

FAQs : Panipat immigration fraud

What is the Panipat immigration fraud case about?

The Panipat immigration fraud case concerns a complaint that approximately ₹40 lakh was allegedly taken from a family on the promise of sending their son abroad. The complaint also contains allegations of threats, assault and caste-based abuse.

How much money was allegedly taken in Panipat immigration fraud?

The complainant alleged that approximately ₹40 lakh was taken by March 2024.

Who are the accused in Panipat immigration fraud?

The FIR names Gurdev, his son Sumit, Sumit’s wife Jyoti and Gurdev’s wife, according to the supplied report.

Why did the National Commission for Scheduled Castes become involved?

The complainant approached the NCSC after alleging that he did not receive relief at the local level. The Commission subsequently recommended an impartial investigation, registration of an FIR and submission of a report within 15 days.

What does the accused Gurdev say in Panipat immigration fraud?

Gurdev has denied the allegations and reportedly maintained that the dispute concerns mutual financial transactions, not fraud committed on the promise of sending someone abroad.

Is the ₹40 lakh fraud proven?

No. The allegations are currently being investigated by police. The accused’s version will also be considered, and guilt can only be determined through due legal process.

What evidence could police examine in Panipat immigration fraud?

Investigators may examine financial transactions, communications, witness statements and the alleged phone recording referred to in the complaint.

Why is this Panipat immigration fraud case significant?

The case combines allegations of an overseas employment-related financial dispute with claims of threats and caste-based abuse, and it reached the National Commission for Scheduled Castes before the FIR was registered.


Final Takeaway On Panipat immigration fraud

The latest Panipat immigration fraud case involves allegations that around ₹40 lakh was taken from a Siwah family on the promise of sending their son abroad. The complainant has also alleged threats, assault and caste-based abuse after demanding the money back.

Following intervention by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes, Panipat’s Sector 29 Police registered a case against four people. One of the accused has denied the allegations and described the matter as a financial dispute.

The investigation will now determine the authenticity of the allegations, the movement of the alleged funds and the individual roles of those named in the FIR.


Source : Dainik Bhaskar

Read About : Human Trafficking Scam Camp Fraud Suspect Arrested for Sending Indians to Scam Camps


Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

hello, hope you doing well.